Sean Morgan Interview on Current Events | Exploring Brazil's Political Landscape and the Global Impact of Cryptocurrencies

Sean Morgan will weigh down on current events, Brazil & silver!


Ready to explore Brazil like never before? Buckle up! Our friend and guest, Imani, gives us a whirlwind tour of the country’s political landscapes and unique housing construction styles. We discuss the resilience of its economy and the impactful nature of its recent elections, comparing and contrasting it with familiar scenarios in the US. Our conversation takes a significant turn as we examine an intriguing proposed law with potentially severe implications for democracy in Brazil.

Globetrotting doesn’t end here; our focus pans to other powerhouses: the US, BRICS nations, and more. We shine the spotlight on the political chess game between Trump and Biden, the dynamics of BRICS countries, and the economic implications of the growing trend of cryptocurrencies. The resilience of the Russian economy, the potential of silver, and the looming possibility of a global financial crash are all part of the mix. We even delve into the thought-provoking possibility of a parallel economy where silver becomes our currency of choice. 

For a dash of mystery, we’ve got you covered with discussions on military secrets, potential energy sources, and the fascinating topic of UFOs. As we further explore the realm of the unknown, Bitcoin and cryptos emerge as potential buffers against traditional investments. We entertain the idea of a rainbow currency and the need for trust in institutions. We also weigh in on the importance of transparency and accountability in decision-making. Tune in and join us in our quest for knowledge, perspective, and meaningful change. Prepare to be enlightened and informed in a way you never expected.
.
.
.
#BRICS #Brazil #Brasil #BRICSNATIONS #Trumpindictments

Transcript

Speaker 1: 0:00

Here we go. Good evening Patriots. I have a wonderful guest on a friend of mine that I guess I had you on two years ago for the first time.

Speaker 2: 0:10

Yeah, it's been a while.

Speaker 1: 0:11

Yeah, and just a wonderful Patriot, been on the front lines probably more than five years. You had the Q&A report before.

Speaker 2: 0:21

Yeah, I started that in March of 2020, so it feels like five years, but I think it's been more like three Great perfect.

Speaker 1: 0:27

Well, it's a long time, and so I'm delighted to have Imani, who lives in Brazil, so we're going to get an update on Brazil and several other topics, including silver, all right. So, sean, it's gosh, it's so great to have you on another show. It's been a long time.

Speaker 2: 0:41

Yeah, it's just like old times.

Speaker 1: 0:43

Yeah, yeah. So I'm going to want to talk about several things, and probably the first thing I'd like to ask about is Brazil. What's going on? An update Lula da Silva? The mess he's making and any other interesting stuff going on that?

Speaker 2: 1:04

we don't know about yet here. Well, when Lula took power in a very similar way that Joe Biden took power, with the messy election, with fraud and everything, it was a very similar it's like almost an identical situation with the US, because there was a kind of J6 fake insurrection that happened, and then Bolsonaro had the ability just like Trump had the ability, with all of his supporters to do massive protests. But he told, and they started to do it. The truckers were blocking roadways and doing massive national strikes and stuff, and Bolsonaro basically told them to stand down. And that's what Trump did too, by the way. I mean, trump could have, on January 6 and after January 6, told all of his Trump supporters to go to the streets and protest the stolen election, but he didn't do that. He basically said we're going to figure this out. And so the same thing happened in Brazil. Just, bolsonaro just kind of stepped aside and went quiet, and there was a fear that Lula would like be more of a crackdown authoritarian than he's been. So far he hasn't done much of anything.

Speaker 2: 2:22

There is a proposed law that would have a very harsh penalty for anyone who's contributing to non democratic efforts. So the way they worded it really means they could put anyone in jail for any type of political activity they don't agree with. But the way they're selling it is they're saying well, this is just if you, if you are trying to overthrow the government, you know then then you have this punishment. But in Brazil, murder is actually not highly punishable. You may go to jail for only 10 years for murder in Brazil. So this punishment for doing things that the Brazilian government says is undemocratic has a worse punishment than murder in Brazil. So that's, that's what we're afraid is going to be rolled out and is going to happen. But so far it's just a proposed legislation and hasn't actually gone into law, and they haven't, of course, started to enforce it yet.

Speaker 1: 3:25

So that's just for funding those programs, right, is that?

Speaker 2: 3:29

what he's now for participating for, for being a part of a political movement that wants to overthrow the government. Well, they just use the term undemocratic. So they say that Bolsonaro supporters are undemocratic, that they believe in a military takeover, but that's not true. They believe in true democracy and voting without voter fraud. So it's the same kind of thing Joe Biden says about Trump supporters that they're fascists, and you know all of that that they're. They don't believe in democracy.

Speaker 2: 4:04

So so, and there is some a little bit of crackdown on on journalists and certain politicians on social media. The Supreme Court in Brazil has a lot of power to be able to de platform people on social media, and so that's very troubling as well. But for me, I don't even talk about politics in Brazil. No one bothers me here. I just talk about American politics. I've never been censored in Brazil. Besides, one thing that's kind of weird is that my basically the equivalent of Amazoncom in Brazil is Mercado Livre, so you basically need this app to be able to buy anything in Brazil, and they de platform me. They didn't tell me why. So that's the only thing that's happened to me in Brazil.

Speaker 2: 4:51

But to give people an idea of what it's like on the ground in Brazil, it's actually very stable and very economically robust, so I would say Brazil is doing better than most of Latin America right now. Especially where I live in Sao Paulo, it's a financial center of really all of South America at this point. So when a Brazilians go to travel to Argentina, they're surprised that they they feel like they're rich there because the currency is much stronger than the Argentine peso right now. Argentina is struggling economically and so it's very stable here. Like people think, oh, sean's in Brazil, sean's in third world country and everything. But I feel more kind of safe here for any type of crisis that might occur financial crisis or or maybe a war or something like that.

Speaker 2: 5:53

I feel like Brazil has this very protectionist system where they manufacture a lot of stuff within the country instead of in abroad and they charge like 100% import tax if you want to try to get stuff from abroad, which is annoying because there are only some things that they don't make in Brazil. You know they don't make good, really good cars in Brazil. They don't make really good computers and cell phones in Brazil, but other things, like when you want to build a house, you can. Everything that you need to build a house is made in Brazil and so there is a sense of a secure like economic base here and and yeah it's, it's actually going fine here in Brazil. Did?

Speaker 1: 6:40

you build a house with bricks, or did you build the crappy houses we build here that you can punch your hand through the wall?

Speaker 2: 6:48

Yeah, in Brazil they, as you know, they exclusively use concrete to build, which is so much stronger. Oh, I know, yeah, so yeah, I did build a house with concrete.

Speaker 1: 7:00

Okay, but that was odd.

Speaker 2: 7:04

It was a big learning experience for me. I had never I mean, my dad's a contractor, so I had a lot of experience with, you know, wood framed houses. But first time working with concrete, it was a big learning curve because there's like all these different phases, like you know, of finish work. You know first there's a brick and then they put this kind of a sloppy level, and then this is the second level and then the third finish level, and so you finally have that nice smooth thing and then you can paint it.

Speaker 1: 7:31

But yeah, I'm watching a video of a Brazilian was going into you know the difference between the houses in Brazil and in the US and what the benefits and and you know cons were. And he said he the one benefit he said, which was interesting, the only benefit he gave to our houses here was that if there was a tornado or a hurricane or whatever, you could rebuild it quickly, whereas in Brazil all the concrete just broke.

Speaker 2: 7:58

you know, you know you're not going to hear everything else down In Brazil they don't have her and they were very fast at building with concrete and sometimes you can just get a concrete truck and pour pour pretty quickly. But yeah, I mean it's really nice actually. Another reason why I feel very stable in Brazil is because I own land and there's a big garden and it's temperate year round. We don't have to pay for air conditioning or heating and we have solar panels. That covers like we have four solar panels on our roof and it creates all the energy that we need all year round. So I mean, it was only a couple thousand dollars for the solar panels.

Speaker 2: 8:47

So in Brazil, that's just to give you an idea.

Speaker 1: 8:50

Yeah, so that sets you up. Is a dollar still strong in Brazil?

Speaker 2: 8:53

I mean, I remember when it used to be like yeah, the dollar is actually you know, three times that still quite strong. It's a five, five Brazilian Hayes to one one dollar, and it used to be six. So the dollar was even stronger before now. But yeah, so I'm lucky because I earn in dollars. In the next change it for Brazilian currency. So at this time, the top. The whole five years I've been here, the dollar's been extremely strong, which has been really good for me. Not so good for Brazilians who want to travel to the US.

Speaker 1: 9:28

Right, have you been to Argentina? You might as well go. Now that it's, we have an advantage.

Speaker 2: 9:33

I've never been there. I really, really want to go. The currency it's advantageous for me to go, but you know the flights are not cheap. They're getting there 300 bucks or 400 bucks or 500 bucks, which you know it's cheap maybe for America, but for here, brazilian flights, I feel like I could. You know I can go to Rio de Janeiro for like 30 bucks on a bus, so I'm comparing it to that.

Speaker 1: 10:01

Yeah, Well, if you go to go to Buenos Aires, you know that's, that's really where it's, you know that's where we were. And then Rio de Janeiro. So I know you finally went to Rio. So that was good. You finally, that was your first time, right.

Speaker 2: 10:16

I've been two times now and both times I only went for for like one day. So I really have not truly experienced Rio, especially not during the good weather. I've never been to the beach. I didn't enter the water. I mean, I went to the beach but I didn't even enter the water because it's cold this time of year it's cold.

Speaker 1: 10:33

It's always cold in the water in Brazil, very cold. So, um, but you know, you might like just make sure you dive under the, under the waves, because they're very, very high. And I remember I didn't know that and I went under the wave and it threw me around. I hit the bottom and I mean they're, those waves are scary. So I mean they're like way high when you're trying to get and they break very close to the, to the sand, so they're hard. So when you do go, make sure you dive into the waves. Okay, so didn't they permanently keep Bolsonaro from running for president again? Didn't I hear that?

Speaker 2: 11:14

I did not hear that. I mean, that's the. It's the same strategy they're doing against Trump that they're trying to do against Bolsonaro.

Speaker 1: 11:21

Right, and that just came out.

Speaker 2: 11:22

I've heard this proposed that they want to stop Bolsonaro from being eligible to even run again because they know, just like they know Trump has so much support. They know what a threat these two guys are for being elected again.

Speaker 1: 11:39

So they're trying to do that to Trump. What are your thoughts on that and their ability to?

Speaker 2: 11:44

be. I don't think. I don't think they're going to be successful. Like, let's say they are successful they legally stopped Donald Trump from running for president. What are we gonna say about it? What about the millions of Trump supporters? What do we have to say about our candidate being undemocratically removed from from the race? Right, you know that's, that's big. We can't take us out of the equation. It's not like they, the elites, are controlling what happens. We control what happens. They're just a few, a few people who act like they're in charge. We're the ones are really in charge. So it's all. It's all up to us.

Speaker 2: 12:25

And I think, of course, how Trump dances with this is going to be very interesting, especially in court. He can present things on his side, right? He can present voter fraud. He can present a lot of different things, and look at how Joe Biden and Hunter Biden's crimes are being exposed more and more day by day. So this is gonna this is gonna just be a radically different story when we get close to the election time. What we know about Hunter and Joe, whether Joe is even around, right? Does that mean Kamala's around? I think they've been setting up Michelle Obama to run.

Speaker 1: 13:03

That's why she had a book.

Speaker 2: 13:04

That's why she was in Netflix. You know that's is a propaganda campaign the big book, the big book campaign, the big Netflix show to prop her up as a figure. And Roger Stone predicted this very recently at a at the turning point conference. He said I'm officially making the prediction that they will not run Newsom because, according to the Democratic woke rules, when Kamala's in charge because Joe Biden doesn't have much time left when Kamala's in charge and then she doesn't even want to be in charge and people don't like her the only person who can replace a woman of color, according to their woke rules, is another woman of color. And that logic is weird as it is, it makes sense to them and so it could roll that way.

Speaker 1: 13:57

Well, one of the things X-22 said is that when that starts getting the rhetoric, that's when Trump is gonna go on the offensive and start exposing everything Obama's guilty of, like all the crimes he did, and I thought that was really interesting. So once that happens just like just like once DeSantis started running then now everything's being exposed little by little about him. So I thought that was an interesting, an interesting thought process.

Speaker 2: 14:28

Yeah, that makes sense to me too and some people. Patel Patriot has put this out there that Donald Trump set it up and he baited the deep state to put Joe Biden in as the candidate, because it's so easy to run against Joe Biden and he has so many crimes, and so that gives Trump leverage against him. And so, yes, look at what we're discovering about Obama through Joe Biden's crimes, because he was doing this stuff as Joe, as Obama's VP.

Speaker 1: 15:02

You know, it's really interesting how you know as insignificant a senator he was although it wasn't insignificant that he did that crime bill, that he was so guilty of so much financial mob crimes. You know, I keep thinking how, how you know, how is this insignificant little weasel that lied to try to get the presidency? How is he so powerful? Or why did they allow him to be so powerful in this? You know, corruption, because they didn't prop him up to be president. They could have at any point.

Speaker 2: 15:42

Yeah, I think that these types, these Machiavellian people who consider themselves elites, they understand the way you get and grab power is by blackmailing and leveraging other people. So, for example, I've heard that some of the people who run the CIA that they got that position, that they wanted to be the head of the CIA, and the way they got that position is they said to Obama hey, I've got dirt on you. I got your birth certificate, you make me the head of CIA, or else and you know that could be some of the ways that some of these people climb the ladder.

Speaker 1: 16:27

So let's go into bricks. We know the US isn't part of bricks and and on your interview with Matt, y'all talked about Victorian. He talked about Victoria Newland being over there, so that kind of doesn't make sense.

Speaker 2: 16:43

She's just visiting, she's just trying, she's in enemy territory, you know she's going in there trying to run defense to stop what they're about to do. We've got two sides. It's just like World War II, only the opposite, because the US is on the enemy side this time. So in World War II we had Nazi Germany, fascist Italy, fascist Japan, you know those, the Axis powers versus the Allies, and the world was split in two between two powerful sides with militaries and manufacturing bases on both sides. And now we have the US side, which is a lot of the crown-controlled Commonwealth countries like the UK and Australia and Canada, new Zealand, and then the US and its traditional allies like South Korea and Japan, these proxies and the EU versus the rest of the whole world, china, russia these are the BRICS nations.

Speaker 2: 17:53

Like pretty much everyone that's outside of that US-controlled side is joining the BRICS now, like almost every country we're talking, more than half of the human population is on the BRICS side and their meeting in Durban, south Africa, this month in August and the embassy in Russia has hinted that they're going to do a gold-backed currency and Durban, south Africa, is the place for the meeting.

Speaker 2: 18:21

And this is like the if there was any city in the world that you could say was a gold city where they do gold mining, it would be Durban, south Africa. And so, yeah, it's becoming quite obvious at this point that the BRICS are going to be launching some type of economic system to counter this kind of globalist, devious world economic forum kind of thing that they've all been talking about, which is this unified ledger, that the central bank cryptocurrency, and these other countries China, russia, saudi Arabia, now Venezuela is talking about joining these countries that have a lot of commodities. It's not just gold. They have a lot of oil, they have a lot of other commodities, so they might end up launching a currency based on a basket of commodities like energy and gold, and I know you wanted to talk about silver.

Speaker 1: 19:18

Right. Because, but before we do Go ahead, russia's crypto just, or central bank currency, just took place yesterday. If Russia is out to help its people, which it seems like they have, what is the purpose of their CBDC?

Speaker 2: 19:42

Well, I think that the BRICS currency is going to be a cryptocurrency, but it's going to be backed by commodities, or gold, or gold and a basket of commodities. So it's very important that this new system is just as technologically advanced as the American side system. You know, we have to have instant transactions, we have to be able to these banks to be able to interoperate easily, so we have to use the latest technology, and the latest technology to work with money is blockchain, cryptocurrency. So I don't see it as necessarily a bad thing that Russia is doing a pilot program or launching a digital currency, because it's better for these governments to work the kinks out of the system.

Speaker 2: 20:41

You don't want to launch a currency that doesn't work. No one will trust it. So I mean Russia. I don't think it's black and white that Russia is like an angel and they're so great and wonderful. There are people in poverty in Russia that the quality, the level of quality of life you know for the lower class, is not the best there. It's not like a super rich country where everyone is rich. But I will say it is surprising how resilient they've been, how well their economy has done, despite the fact that the whole world, with the US leading the way, has been weaponizing the global economic system against them.

Speaker 1: 21:34

Right, right, all right. So let's go into silver.

Speaker 2: 21:41

Yeah. So I love silver. I think that as it's what's so great about it compared to gold, the one thing is it's more accessible to normal people. You know, gold has traditionally been the money of the central banks, not the money of the people, because it's just so expensive per ounce, and so, you know, for a poor person to hold a gold coin is, like you know, holding their life savings. It doesn't make any sense. But silver one ounce worth 25, 30 bucks that's accessible for every person on earth. So I like that and I like that it's an industrial metal, that we use it for things that are really important, like solar panels and electronics and medical equipment and all that stuff.

Speaker 2: 22:29

So there's a there's a silver shortage globally. We don't have enough silver to do what we want to do with it and it's so undervalued it's like the all time highs of silver are like double, more than double what it is now. So that to me that means silver has a long way to rise just to get at a normal level. And it's now that we've got this possible gold backed currency that's going to be launched, a global and very important currency. That means gold is going to be in much higher demand and gold prices are going to rise and what we've seen historically is that every time gold rises, silver rises to just to try to catch up.

Speaker 2: 23:21

So that's why, you know, and I recently talked to the owner of a gold dealing company and I asked him, you know, what do you think about gold? What do you think about silver? What kind of level do you think it's going to be at? And he said he thought that gold is going to double, but he thought that silver was going to quadruple within a within a short period of time. That was just his opinion, right? But that's someone who is in the industry who really believes that. So that's interesting to me. When I talk to Dr Kirk Elliott, when I talk to other people, they often tell me they think silver has a higher.

Speaker 1: 23:57

Silver is lesser valued right now and has a higher potential, higher upside which is why that's the recommendation from Kirk Elliott and and others that silver is the one to go. But isn't it the banks that him notoriously held down the value of the metals of gold and silver?

Speaker 2: 24:13

Yeah, they don't. They don't want competition, right, they don't. They don't want people to think, to even think of gold and silver as money. They they even use the term. Ben Bernanke, central banker for the US. He was quizzed in Congress. They asked him why do you hold gold? And he said oh just, it's just tradition. But he said gold is a relic. So so they say that. They say it's just tradition, it's just a relic, but they're buying right hundreds of thousands of tons of gold. All the central banks in the world are gobbling it up right now. So you can't believe what they say, you have to believe what they do. They perceive gold as money, not as a tradition and not as a relic. They know it's the real money and that paper stuff is just trash.

Speaker 1: 25:06

So what do you see happening when they, you know, take everybody into CBDC Because we know that's coming. So on a parallel side, do you see us paying like because we're creating a parallel economy, with, you know, people having chickens and and fruits and vegetables and cattle to sell meat? Do you see us buying that with silver from each other?

Speaker 2: 25:38

Or do you see, I actually I'm not. I'm not much of a doomsday, you know. I think I mean I do think there's going to be a major global financial crisis. I mean it would be a. We had one during. We had a stock market crash during COVID, we had the 2009 crash, we've had Black Friday in the 80s, we had, you know, the 29 crash and the Great Depression, and all of those things really are opportunities for Black Rock, for the central banks, for the oligarchs to buy up Things that are valuable real estate and businesses for pennies on the dollar. So that's what I think is coming is a financial crash. We have just so much debt in the system that is basically designed to to fail at some point. It's only a matter of time. We can't even pay back the interest on our debt and with, with all of this political uncertainty, I think the powers that be once a chaotic event to distract people from the political situation and to be able to use that trauma-based mind control to make them vulnerable and follow and say hey, now we created a problem. Now here's the solution. It's the central bank.

Speaker 2: 27:05

Cryptocurrency Could be universal basic income like oh, you have no money, here's some free money. So that's something to watch out for. But the parallel economy, yes, it could play out the way you said. It could be that there's a situation on the ground where we have to figure out how to do business with each other Could happen. We should probably prepare for it. But the way I see it playing out is the states will, and already are, doing things differently from the federal government. You're already having states with proposing gold and silver as constitutional state money. You already have half of the darn world switching over to probably a commodity-based or gold-based currency. So to me, if half the world's already using a gold-based currency and a few of the Patriot states are already using a gold-based currency, then there we have it. We have the alternative parallel Patriot system and it's global, and you can't forget Bitcoin.

Speaker 1: 28:10

I don't think that that's right. But before you go into that, when I was talking about CBDC it's not a dims day thing because I know it's all temporary anyway but supposedly the CBDC is supposed to do away with paper money and now they've taken everybody's money in the banks and throwing it into a CBDC central bank digital currency. Am I right about that? That's my understanding of what's coming from the front.

Speaker 2: 28:41

Pretty much everyone that I know that analyzes the future of money anticipates that the powers that be want to create a cashless society. We know that because they're already doing it. They're already making it harder and harder to make withdrawals. Certain countries ban withdrawals. In Canada, they've already gotten rid of pennies. They're not producing as much cash as they used to produce. Of course, cash equals privacy. They don't want us to have privacy. It's just so obvious. They don't want us to have cash.

Speaker 1: 29:20

The probability of the CBDC. Is there right Taking people's accounts and making it?

Speaker 2: 29:28

The FedNow system launched in July, last month. It's not a CBDC, but it's the technology that it will be based on. It's basically a pilot program that leads to that CBDC you talked about. They're launching one in Russia. They already launched one in China. There's 30 countries around the world launching it. It is just going to happen. It's like are we going to use landlines forever? No, we switched to cell phones. It is something that's going to happen. It's just an evolution of technology. The question is, who's going to control it? Is it going to be in a democratic way? Is it going to be an authoritarian way? Will there be something backing the currency or not? This is the biggest power struggle. Who controls the global monetary?

Speaker 1: 30:24

system Bitcoin. You were going to talk about that.

Speaker 2: 30:32

That scene in Star Wars where there's the Death Star and then they get that perfect shot that's in the hole and then it blows up and it kills the Death Star. That's Bitcoin to the global monetary system, or it could be. It's one way it could play out. Because Bitcoin, no one controls it, it's decentralized and it's scarce. It has all of those elements that I talked about. That's modern financial transactions. To make them fast and easy and global. You can basically be your own bank. It gets rid of the need for central banks or any banks. You can still have financial services and custodians and different things like that, but you don't need them. They don't like competition.

Speaker 2: 31:28

It's been interesting to watch how they the system have been trying to deal with Bitcoin. It seems like they've given up trying to stop it. Now BlackRock and probably everyone knows who BlackRock is along with Vanguard, they basically control most of the world's stocks, managing funds, all everyone's retirements accounts in Vanguard and BlackRock. Blackrock is launching a Bitcoin exchange-traded fund. They want to be the ones who own all the Bitcoin. Even they are anticipating Bitcoin becoming popular and becoming valuable and they want to be the ones that can influence that market by being the custodians and being the ones involved in it. That's something else. Just like people used to say, or still say, that gold should be a percentage of your portfolio as a hedge against if the stock market goes down, then gold goes up, I view now Bitcoin as another hedge. It's not like you want to put your life savings in Bitcoin, but you might put 1% or half a percent of your portfolio in Bitcoin. You'd be very, very happy if it becomes a global currency.

Speaker 1: 33:03

There was somebody talking to us about that. My point was well, how do you know the central bank or the cabal wouldn't gain control of Bitcoin? He said impossible. I didn't totally understand that. Can you explain that?

Speaker 2: 33:24

That's what's so great about Bitcoin compared to all the other cryptocurrencies out there is that it's so decentralized. There are so many different people around the world that have Bitcoin and use Bitcoin. They are distributed nodes in the network. The more quantity of different people are holding Bitcoin, the more resilient that network is and the harder it is to mess with it and manipulate it. Bitcoin keeps going in that direction. It's not getting more centralized, it's getting more decentralized. If things keep going in that direction, then it'll be great. I guess I could imagine a scenario where all the billionaires in the world say to all the poor people we'll give you double. Whatever the market rate is for Bitcoin, we'll give you double. We'll give you this or that, or gold or houses or real estate, whatever it is, we just want the Bitcoin. There could end up being a consolidation of Bitcoin. It's been around since 2010 and it's only been more and more decentralized every year.

Speaker 1: 34:46

Interesting Rainbow currency. Do you see that happening? That's something that's been talked about as going to a rainbow currency. What are your thoughts on that?

Speaker 2: 35:01

There's been a mythology in the truth movement. When I say mythology, I don't necessarily mean false. I just mean that a myth is a story that people believe the Nasara, jisara rainbow currency. I think this is resonating with people and I think a little bit of it is semantics. I believe there will be a jubilee. By jubilee I mean debt cancellation. We're in a system it's a debt-based system that's coming to an end. There's really no other way to deal with a bunch of debt besides cancel it. A lot of the people who are the creditors are guilty parties. A lot of that is fraudulent in nature. It should be legally canceled anyway. If we have a world war, there's probably going to be a lot of debt cancellation. Let's say there's a war between China and the US. The US would say well, we're not paying you back. China has given the United States a lot of money over the last few decades and it's over a trillion dollars. That could be one form of debt cancellation. I think there's going to be debt cancellation.

Speaker 2: 36:25

I talked about how there's probably going to be a global gold backed currency. To me, that's a dream come true. Debt cancellation and gold backed currency that's good enough. For me, that's just how it could roll out. It could roll out a different way. We might end up having the patriots control a US digital currency and everyone gets a universal basic income. I have no idea how it's going to go. I think we have something to say about it. It all depends on what we trust. Do we trust in gold? Do we trust in Bitcoin? Do we trust in the US government? Do we not trust in it? I think the states will have a lot to say about this too. The states have more power than people realize to determine their state economies. You might even have a section of states that secedes or creates their own network or their own country and their own currency. It's a possibility. I don't know.

Speaker 1: 37:40

Well, Texas is always talking about seceding. They've been talking about that for decades.

Speaker 2: 37:47

Well, they people don't realize how big, geographically and economically, Texas is. It is equal to the size of Thailand and it's look, all of that talent and knowledge and everything moved from Silicon Valley to Austin and it's a very, it's a very, it's a very powerful spot and a lot of people moving there, as you know. So it's something for Texans to decide that they have a lot of power to be their own country.

Speaker 1: 38:28

But I believe that all this silicon, silicone that's come to Austin was to infiltrate Texas, because these people are not our friends. They burned our city, They've defunded our police, they're controlling all of you know, the city council and everybody here, and it's going to be different bad to worse. So I think I think they came to infiltrate. I don't really believe that they came to. You know, build this great economy. Now we have other Californians that are coming to escape California.

Speaker 1: 38:58

But as far as it goes from from those guys. But the talk about seceding is really a lot of the Texans, the good old boys, a lot of these have been talking about it for decades. So I could see, I could see that happening. But I also could see where you know, where all the patriots pulled together and we saved the US. And because saving the US is not going to be seceding states, you know, seceding states goes away.

Speaker 2: 39:24

Yeah, that would. That would really be more of a worst case scenario. If there's a civil war or there's political instability, there would be that kind of option For for the patriot states to get together and secede. But I mean, just like you, I want to save the US. I think Trump is our best hope and this is going to be a really interesting 2024 election. I'll tell you that.

Speaker 1: 39:54

So there's a, as you know, and there's this talk about all of this being to expose the deep state and to wake America up, and you know that these people are really actors. What are your thoughts on that?

Speaker 2: 40:17

Well, we know, we know that politicians use body doubles.

Speaker 1: 40:22

I mean, that's not even a conspiracy theory, but is even the good side of the bad side that's got the body doubles like Biden. Okay, come on, that's not him.

Speaker 2: 40:31

That's the big question, isn't it? That's the big question. There are things, there are indicators to me that sometimes it seems like the good guys Like, for example, cocaine in the White House who would plant that story. It wouldn't be the bad guys, right? That's waking people up.

Speaker 1: 40:51

And falling down the stairs, come on. The deep state's not going to have somebody fall down the stairs if they're trying to. If they're trying to.

Speaker 2: 40:59

There's no way they would do that they wouldn't have this clown. I wish I knew. This is just one of those things. It's like quantum reality. I wish that I knew behind the scenes who had that control. I've even seen. I know this is really out there, and you know I usually don't go really out there.

Speaker 1: 41:21

I know, but my audience is out there.

Speaker 2: 41:23

So that's why I'm asking you this stuff I've seen video of a bipedal robot walking, and then I've seen a video of Joe Biden walking.

Speaker 1: 41:36

You know that kind of Send me that video of the of the vibe.

Speaker 2: 41:42

And it's uncanny. It's like, wow, the Joe Bolly could be like an advanced robot and like look at what they disclosed and released to the public just this year with chat GPT, like it's. It's unbelievable I don't know if you played around with it, but like it's so powerful and so like if that's available for the public, imagine you know what they have in these advanced military technology. So going along, go ahead.

Speaker 1: 42:19

Thanks. How are we going to? How are we going to if there's, if there's now all these deep fakes coming out that are really, really realistic? How do we now share video and say, hey, this is from the past, this is, you know, hillary doing these crimes? Here's, I mean, now we got deep. Oh well, that's a deep fake. How do we, how do we even right Counter that narrative now?

Speaker 2: 42:47

You mentioned next 22 before, and I remember when he brought this up and he said it's easy to do technological analysis of a video to determine if it's artificial intelligence or not. So all you have to do is have the video, analyze it and you know. So this is one of those things that the deep state will just say. They'll just say that's a deep fake. But then our response needs to be okay then prove it in a court of law where we analyze it and see if it's a deep fake or not. So that is an important thing for people to know is that you can determine if something's a deep fake or not. You don't just look at it, you have to use software to analyze it.

Speaker 1: 43:32

And how do people have this software to analyze it, like, how do we have that software, to say when I say it's a soft one.

Speaker 2: 43:40

It's the same way a college professor can determine if an essay was plagiarized. It scans it and says, okay, these phrases were already on the internet. You can upload videos, you can upload text on the internet on different online software and it will tell you if it's artificial intelligence or not.

Speaker 1: 44:06

Well, send me that software.

Speaker 2: 44:08

I will.

Speaker 1: 44:08

I'm going to read those sites online that you can do that if you know which ones they are.

Speaker 2: 44:12

Yeah, yeah, you bet.

Speaker 1: 44:15

So you said you had Matt back on today. Is there anything more you want to talk about Silver and I can put the link up and then you can tell me some. Yeah.

Speaker 2: 44:26

I mean, I have my life savings in Silver, so this is not just me pumping this. I've had it for several years and I sleep so well at night. I bought Silver when it was at $28 an ounce and now it's a little bit lower. But I don't care about these temporary market changes because I'm in this for the long haul. It's my savings, it's not my checking account and I just sleep so well. If I had my money in the stock market, I would not sleep well.

Speaker 2: 44:57

I don't know what that's going to do Tomorrow. The whole thing could crash, but I know in August they're going to have this meeting and they're probably going to launch a commodity-based currency and Silver really has nowhere else to go but up right now, in my opinion. It's only my opinion, I'm not a financial advisor, but I really think there's just so much upside, so little downside An industrial metal that we don't have enough of to make solar panels. This is an awesome opportunity for people, in my opinion, and I work with Kirk. I'm working with Kirk on different shows. I interview him every week on Badlands, learning a lot from him, and I've been recommending Kirk for three years now, so I know you recently worked with him as well.

Speaker 1: 45:49

Yeah, I watched a couple of your interviews with him and I want to go back and watch it to ask him tomorrow something he said that they did, which I know it was a big deal. They did to the US dollar, like the central bank did something, and so I need to go back and watch that because I want to ask him about that tomorrow. And then I want to tell my audience that they have any questions. You know, ultimately they're gonna need to call him to set up a consultation if they want to go through with with purchasing, but If they have any questions, I did talk to Ashley and she said they could do a Q&A as well. So I want to invite anyone that's listening right now to write your question Questions down that you can ask him about about silver, okay, so let's go into what you said you covered today.

Speaker 2: 46:40

So Matt had covered this stuff about, you know, china going in on the moon and all this alternative stuff, and we don't know enough about that yet, except that we do believe that on some level it's a scythe right, that's so yeah, I think everything related to space, because this is top secret, military stuff really, if you think about it, anything that has to do with unexplored territory, antarctica, space, the moon this is proprietary Knowledge and information that they use for military purposes. So they're not going to tell the public all the nitty-gritty details, they're gonna give them some blurry photos to look at. And so In this interview with Matt, he informed me this is the first time that I realized this that Russia and China sent Luna robots there and they found a whole bunch of helium three on the dark side of the moon, and Helium three, you know, at this time not usable as an energy source, but in the near future could be. He described it as you know, one dump truck would would power the entire planet for for decades or a hundred years or something like that. So so that Energy is everything. Energy is everything.

Speaker 2: 48:11

In China, they've got a hundred nuclear reactors under construction. They've signed long-term contracts with Kazakhstan to bring in uranium. Energy is Everything when it comes to power, political power, economic power. Why do you think Saudi Arabia has been so powerful? Because all the oil. So this could be a game-changer. And Today we did a show about UFOs. Iops is a really great.

Speaker 1: 48:37

I want you to go into because that's been, that's been out, like dr Greer, showing that you know we've got, you know, you know spacecraft that we copied and engineered, so so then that goes into the question of where did they come from If we really didn't go to the moon, like if that is really a Psyop, and we really didn't go, which? If you look at the videos, yeah, that's, those were fake that are circulating, but Then where would they have come from? But we do know there's all this technology like hovering stuff and Antigravity goal and stuff like that. So what, what did he have to say about all that?

Speaker 2: 49:17

What he had to say is that the Germans did a lot of this type of research and when they lost World War two, they were the German scientists and all of their research was absorbed into the military industrial complexes in the UK and the US at, you know, warner von Braun in charge of NASA, and and yes, we have this technology. We kind of put it to the side in our conversation Whether it was extraterrestrial or terrestrial nature. But the point is that most of the time that people are seeing this type of stuff, it's probably military aircraft. And how did we develop it, I don't know. But you know, it's Probably not little green men flying them, it's probably the military industrial complex flying them.

Speaker 2: 50:12

And so Once you think of it in that in those terms, you start to realize how all of these movies and all this congressional thing and the disclosure project and all this stuff in the history Channel, it's all a siob to get us to think Little green men instead of thinking military industrial complex. And so he pointed out and this is big news for a lot of people who love the disclosure project and love Tom the long and love all these people who talk about UFOs on the history channel is that this disclosure project was funded by the Rockefellers, so you can't trust anything they say. I mean, the way limited hangouts work is they throw out a little bit of truth and then they mix it with lies.

Speaker 1: 51:02

What did you just be? A lot of truth hangout. What did you just say Limited hangout. So yeah, a limited.

Speaker 2: 51:07

Hangout is where you give people a little bit of truth, like oh, I'm the disclosure project. They have real testimonies from real government officials who really did see flying saucers. They just leave out that little part where the flying saucer was developed by the military industrial complex instead of from little green men right, hmm, interesting.

Speaker 2: 51:30

I mean, I'm not put. I'm not just dismissing the possibility of extraterrestrial life at all, but Our government lies to us. We can't believe them. When John Podesta was the main, one of the main people that's home DeLong works with, with With this, a lot of these disclosures, hillary Clinton, harry Reid, john Podesta, these are the people who were clamoring for UFO disclosure. Can you understand why we wouldn't trust what they have to say? Everything you need to know.

Speaker 1: 52:06

Yeah, yeah, for sure, for sure. Well, thank you, sean. Is there anything else you want to add?

Speaker 2: 52:14

No, I just thank you, cynthia. It's always great to talk to you.

Speaker 1: 52:19

All right, see you on the next show. Hang on for a second. I.